A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Social Policies and Mental Health Disparities: Insights from Stigma Research
Plenary 2a - A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Study of Social Policies and Mental Health Disparities: Insights from Stigma Research
Saturday, November 22, 2025
8:30 AM - 9:45 AM CST
Location: Celestin D&E, Level 3
Earn 0.5 Credit
Keywords: Stigma, Mental health disparities, Public policy Level of Familiarity: All Recommended Readings: Lattanner, M.R., McKetta, S., Pachankis, J.E., & Hatzenbuehler, M.L. (2025). State of the science of structural stigma and LGBTQ+ health: Meta-analytic evidence, research gaps, and future directions. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 46, 7.1-7.19., Weissman, D.G., Hatzenbuehler, M.L., Cikara, M., Barch, D.M., & McLaughlin, K.A. (2023). State-level macro-economic factors moderate the association of low income with brain structure and mental health in U.S. children. Nature Communications, 14, 2085. , Hatzenbuehler, M.L., & Pachankis, J.E. (2021). Does stigma moderate the efficacy of mental and behavioral health interventions? Examining individual and contextual moderators of treatment effect heterogeneity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30, 476-484.
Professor Harvard University Cambridge, MA, United States
Psychological research has made significant advancements in the study of stigma, defined as the co-occurrence of labeling, stereotyping, status loss, and discrimination that unfolds in a context of unequal power. However, this work has been criticized for focusing almost exclusively on individual and interpersonal stigma processes to the exclusion of structural factors that promulgate stigmatization. To address this knowledge gap, researchers have recently expanded the stigma construct to consider how broader, macrosocial forms of stigma—what I call structural stigma—also disadvantage stigmatized individuals. In this talk, I will define the construct of structural stigma and discuss one instantiation of it in the form of public policies that target specific groups for social exclusion or that fail to provide legal protections. I will then review several illustrative studies from our research group that use a range of methodological and measurement approaches to document the negative biopsychosocial consequences of exposure to structural stigma across a range of stigmatized statuses, including those related to sexual orientation, race, and socioeconomic status. I will end the talk with a brief discussion of implications of this research for structural and psychological interventions aimed at reducing the negative mental health sequelae of stigma for members of marginalized groups. Collectively, this research highlights the need for clinical scientists to further attend to structural influences in our conceptual models of health, in our empirical studies, and in our interventions aimed at reducing mental health disparities.
Learning Objectives:
At the end of this session, the learner will be able to:
Describe stigma as a multi-level phenomenon ranging from individual to structural levels.
Evaluate the biopsychosocial consequences of structural stigma in the form of social policies that target specific groups for social exclusion or that fail to provide legal protections.
Explore the role of stigma in undermining the efficacy of psychotherapy interventions.
Long-term Goal: Consideration of the role of clinical scientists in addressing mental health disparities resulting from stigmatization.