Symposia
Mental Health Disparities
Melissa J. Dreier, M.S. (she/her/hers)
PhD Student
Rutgers University
Piscataway, NJ, United States
Aijia Yao, M.A.
Clinical Psychology PhD Student
Rutgers University
Piscataway, NJ, United States
Hiba Babekr, None
Undergraduate Research Assistant
Rutgers University
Piscataway, NJ, United States
Faith Orchard, PhD
Lecturer
University of East Anglia
Norwich, England, United Kingdom
Jessica L. Schleider, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Associate Professor, Department of Medical Social Sciences
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL, United States
Maria Loades, PhD
Clinical Psychologist
University of bath
bath, England, United Kingdom
Jessica L. Hamilton, Ph.D. (she/her/hers)
Assistant Professor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Piscataway, NJ, United States
Background: Sleep problems are linked to negative mental health outcomes, both of which rise in prevalence during adolescence and young adulthood. Existing sleep treatments (e.g., Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia) are effective but remain largely inaccessible for this age group. Young people also have lower agency over structural sleep barriers (e.g., home environment, school start times).
Method: Project Sleep is a digital single-session intervention (SSI) designed in tandem with young people to meet their unique sleep needs. Participants included individuals aged 13-25 with self-reported sleep problems (N=761, Mage=18.7; 33% US/67% UK; 48% white, 81% girls, 38% LGBTQ+). Socioeconomic status (SES) ranged from 1-10 (M=6.4, SD=1.7). Structural sleep barriers were reported by 45%: nighttime workers at home (6%), shared rooms (14%), unstable living conditions (2%), uncomfortable temperature (20%), excess light (10%), and noise (17%). Participants rated sleep importance, importance of making a change to sleep, readiness for change, and perceived control pre- and post-SSI. Moderation models assessed whether structural factors influenced outcomes.
Results: All participants showed significant increases in all sleep change metrics (ps< .05). In most cases, there were no moderation effects—those experiencing structural barriers mostly improved similarly to peers (ps >.05). However, lower SES (p=.004) and high-noise environments (p=.04) were linked to smaller gains in perceived control. Those with nighttime workers in the home improved less in sleep change importance (p=.008), and those in unstable living conditions improved less in sleep importance (p=.02). Conversely, lower SES participants improved more in sleep importance (p=.04), and those in shared rooms improved more in perceived control (p=.02).
Conclusions: This brief, accessible SSI effectively supports youth with structural sleep barriers. However, in some cases, those with structural sleep barriers improved less, identifying a need for further adaptation. Future research will work with young people experiencing structural sleep barriers to better address their needs.