Skip to main content
ABCT 2025 59th Annual Convention Main banner
Psychology Tools Ad
Final Program


Icon Legend
This session is not in your schedule.
This session is in your schedule. Click again to remove it.
Presentation Icons
Recorded Session
Recorded Session
Ticketed Session
Ticketed Session
ViewAttendees 1

Symposia

Research Methods and Statistics

Advancing Idiographic Methods Toward Practice: Moving Beyond Concepts to Implementation, Feasibility, and Trial Insights

3 - (SYM 6) Examining the Relationship Between Network-based Subgroups and Treatment Outcomes Among Individuals with Eating Disorders

Friday, November 21, 2025
5:48 PM - 6:09 PM CST
Location: Celestin H, Level 3
Keywords: Implementation, Treatment, Research Methods
Recommended Readings: Ong, C. W., Hayes, S. C., & Hofmann, S. G. (2022). A process-based approach to cognitive behavioral therapy: A theory-based case illustration. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1002849,   Deisenhofer, A. K., Barkham, M., Beierl, E. T., Schwartz, B., Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Beevers, C. G., Berwian, I. M., Blackwell, S. E., Bockting, C. L., Brakemeier, E. L., Brown, G., Buckman, J. E. J., Castonguay, L. G., Cusack, C. E., Dalgleish, T., de Jong, K., Delgadillo, J., DeRubeis, R. J., Driessen, E., Ehrenreich-May, J., … Cohen, Z. D. (2024). Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: Barriers and possible ways forward. Behaviour research and therapy, 172, 104443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2023.104443
Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2167702618772296,   Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019). The future of intervention science: Process-based therapy. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2167702618772296,   Levinson, C. A., Williams, B. M., Christian, C., Hunt, R. A., Keshishian, A. C., Brosof, L. C., Vanzhula, I. A., Davis, G. G., Brown, M. L., Bridges-Curry, Z., Sandoval-Araujo, L. E., & Ralph-Nearman, C. (2023). Personalizing eating disorder treatment using idiographic models: An open series trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 91(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000785,   Woolley, M. G., Sahdra, B. K., Bowers, E. M., Capel, L. K., Twohig, M. P., & Levin, M. E. (2025). An idionomic network analysis of Trichotillomania Treatment Processes: Gathering group-level and individual-level insights to inform a personalized therapeutic framework. Behavior Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2025.01.006
Abstract Body

Background: Psychological treatment effects and response rates have largely plateaued over the past few decades. A potential answer to this problem is personalized treatment approaches, which match treatment to a client’s specific presenting concerns, which should increase its precision and efficacy. Examining predictors and moderators of treatment outcome (who is likely to benefit from treatment, and which treatment) is one way to guide such personalized decision making.

Objective: The current study aimed to investigate the relationship between network-derived subgroups, treatment condition, and treatment response using data from two clinical trials on eating disorders (N = 80). This study is also a proof-of-concept for the clinical utility of network-based subgroups.

Method: Subgroups were identified using Subgrouping Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (S-GIMME) and ANOVAs were used to compare changes in symptom severity and clinical impairment among subgroups.

Results: We found three subgroups (n = 71; mean age = 34.4 [SD = 11.8], 87.3% cisgender women, 85.9% white, non-Hispanic), which were differentiated by how shame and guilt were related in the network. The subgroup with a contemporaneous pathway from guilt to shame showed the least improvement in clinical impairment from pre- to posttreatment (F(2, 64) = 5.92, p = .004).

Conclusions: Overall, our findings suggest that network-based subgroups may have utility as prognostic indicators, at least in the context of eating disorders, though replication of present findings is warranted. Limitations included potentially unstable subgroups and use of mostly cisgender women and white samples.