Symposia
Addictive Behaviors
Katharine L. Thomas, B.A. (she/her/hers)
Graduate Student
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA, United States
Michael J. Zvolensky, Ph.D.
Professor
University of Houston
Houston, TX, United States
Julia D. Buckner, Ph.D.
Professor
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA, United States
Background: Although Black adults evince lower rates of current (past-month) alcohol use than non-Hispanic/Latine White adults, this group is at higher risk for alcohol-related problems (e.g., cirrhosis; Harris et al., 2022) and more severe and chronic alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms (Chartier & Caetano, 2010). Further, women are at higher risk for long-term health effects from their alcohol use than men, and Black women, in particular, face a greater AUD-related health burden than White women (Chartier et al., 2013; Jackson et al., 2015). One factor that appears protective against alcohol misuse among predominantly White samples is significant other (SO) support – to illustrate, high support from a SO has shown to buffer against alcohol problems (Windle & Windle, 2019), and women are more likely than men to drink in heavy quantities when feeling disconnected from their SO (Levitt & Cooper, 2010). However, no known studies have tested the effects of SO support on alcohol use among Black adults.
Methods: The current study used ecological momentary assessment in an on-going study from 39 Black adults (56.5% female) thus far in committed relationships endorsing current hazardous drinking (AUDIT > 5; Reinert & Allen, 2007). Data from the daily interval contingent (each morning) assessment was used to assess past-day alcohol use over a three-week period. A binomial generalized linear model with a logit link was used to test whether baseline SO support interacted with sex to predict likelihood of past-day drinking.
Results: Results indicate that men had a greater likelihood of past-day alcohol use compared to women (B = 4.711, SE = 1.387, Wald χ²(1) = 11.546, p < .001). The main effect of SO support on past-day alcohol use was not statistically significant (Wald χ²(1) = .087, p = .768). However, baseline SO support did interact with sex to predict likelihood of past-day alcohol use (B = -0.891, SE = 0.234, Wald χ²(1) = 14.483, p < .001), such that as SO support increases, past-day alcohol use was less likely for men (B = -0.411, SE = 0.234, Wald χ²(1) = 6.031, p = .014) but more likely for women (B = 0.480, SE = 0.164, Wald χ²(1) = 8.595, p = .003).
Conclusion: This is the first known study of the effects of SO support on alcohol use among Black adults. Contrary to prior work, SO support only reduced likelihood of past-day alcohol use for Black men, not women. Future work is needed to elucidate contextual factors that may contribute to this relationship. Findings have important implications for prevention and treatment efforts for Black adults who engage in hazardous alcohol use.