Professor University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Abstract Text: Cross-cultural studies have consistently shown ethnic differences in social anxiety, with individuals of Asian heritage reporting higher levels of social anxiety compared to those of European heritage. However, there is a lack of empirical research integrating both cultural and evolutionary perspectives to explain these differences. Appeasement, defined as the process by which individuals pacify others to avoid conflict (Keltner et al., 1997), may be a potential construct explaining ethnic differences in social anxiety. There are two types of appeasement: reactive appeasement, which involves emotions such as embarrassment and shame to reduce conflict, and anticipatory appeasement, which involves more general, dispositional strategies like polite modesty and shyness to prevent potential conflict from occurring. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating how reactive and anticipatory appeasement mediate the relationship between ethnicity and social anxiety among Asian American and European American individuals.
A total of 510 European American (392 females; M age = 19.86, SD = 3.43) and 479 Asian American (308 females; M age = 19.47, SD = 2.45) undergraduate students participated. Participants completed an online questionnaire, including demographic items, appeasement measures (Modest Responding Scale [MRS], Guilt and Shame Proneness Scale [GASP], Embarrassability Scale [ES], and the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale [RCBS]), and the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale [SIAS]. Measurement invariance was established using the alignment method to compare latent means between groups. Path analysis was conducted to examine how cultural group differences in appeasement mediate cultural group differences in social anxiety symptoms.
Measurement invariance was established for all measures using the alignment method. Latent mean comparisons revealed that Asian Americans exhibited significantly higher latent means for social interaction anxiety (M = 0.311), modesty (M = 0.298), shyness (M = 0.449), and embarrassability (M = 0.364). Path analysis results indicated a good model fit (χ²(7) = 153.34, p < .001, RMSEA = 0.147, CFI = 0.912, TLI = 0.812, SRMR = 0.067). Both Reactive and Anticipatory appeasement were positively associated with SIAS, with Anticipatory appeasement showing a stronger effect (β = 0.852, p < .001) compared to Reactive appeasement (β = 0.563, p < .001). Regarding Ethnicity, Anticipatory appeasement showed a significant direct effect (β = 0.169, p = .001), while Reactive appeasement did not (β = 0.067, p = .198). These findings suggest that Asian Americans experience higher levels of social anxiety and engage more in appeasement behaviors, such as modesty, shyness, and embarrassability, compared to European Americans. Specifically, anticipatory appeasement, which involves preventing conflict before it arises, plays a significant role in mediating the relationship between ethnicity and social anxiety. This indicates that cultural behaviors aimed at avoiding potential social conflict may contribute to higher anxiety levels reported in Asian Americans compared to European Americans.